USIP hosted a panel discussion April 19 on the state of Pakistan’s security forces that looked at the political and security dynamics at play and how they affect the military.

PAKISTANI FORCES: WHO’S IN CHARGE? – USIP hosted a panel discussion April 19 on the state of Pakistan’s security forces that looked at the political and security dynamics at play and how they affect the military. Border security is a perennial concern in Pakistan, but weak civilian oversight means the military has far more influence. “Who controls the military? It should be the civilians,” said the Atlantic Council’s Shuja Nawaz, one of three panelists. “But the reality on the ground is that there hasn’t been the preparation that I would feel is necessary to run the military. In Pakistan, it’s a question of governance.”

“A CONSTITUTIONALIZED ARMY” – But USIP’s Moeed Yusuf calls the Pakistani military a “constitutionalized army,” meaning that despite its big influence in the country, it still operates “within the system.”

BUILDING CIVILIAN CAPACITY – The panel discussion was led by USIP’s Robert Perito and included Columbia University’s Hassan Abbas as well as Yusuf and Nawaz. All experts generally agreed that the civilian government must be seen as more credible by all Pakistanis. “The civilians have to perform in their own governance tasks much better,” said Yusuf. He noted that there is a “philosophical commitment” to democracy, but that government officials have to do a better job at governing. “People have to start trusting the state… there is no other alternative.”

WHAT ABOUT THE ISI? – Many people believe that Pakistan’s secretive ISI, or Inter-Services Intelligence agency, holds the real power in Pakistan. But Yusuf says there is no credible evidence that point to this. The ISI falls “very much within the national security framework,” he said. “I’ve never seen it as a rogue organization, I’ve just never seen any evidence of that.”

THE ECONOMY PLAYS A HUGE ROLE – Nawaz said that Pakistan relies on “import substitution,” in which it produces goods domestically in part to help prop up its own economy by shunning some imports. “Pakistan has over time been involved in import substitution on a fairly large scale,” said Nawaz. But if the economy stumbles in a large way, then the military is in trouble, he says.

THE BOTTOM LINE ON SECURITY FORCES? – Abbas said that when people talk about changing the bureaucracy in Pakistan, they must be patient. And Yusuf indicated the Pakistani government needs time and space: “If you want Pakistan to get out of this, then the only way is to let the political process function,” he said. “If you keep disrupting the system, then it will never mature.”


Related Publications

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications