Andrew Wilder, director of USIP’s Afghanistan and Pakistan programs, looks at Afghanistan in a time of transition, highlighting the significant developments of the past year and looking ahead to 2013 and beyond.

December 28, 2012

Andrew Wilder, director of USIP’s Afghanistan and Pakistan programs, looks at Afghanistan in a time of transition, highlighting the significant developments of the past year and looking ahead to 2013 and beyond.

  • Security and economic transitions: “The most significant development was that the processes of transition really got fully underway in 2012,” says Wilder. The signing of the Strategic Partnership Agreement, the Chicago NATO Summit, and the Tokyo Conference all demonstrated that the U.S. and its allies will continue to support Afghanistan’s security forces and economy well after 2014, he says. “But it was done in the context of a Mutual Accountability Framework which said that the Afghan government is also going to have to deliver. There are no blank checks here.”
  • Political transition: Afghanistan is also heading towards a major political transition, with President Hamid Karzai due to step down in 2014. “From the perspective of the U.S. Institute of Peace, we feel that this is potentially the most important transition of all in terms of future peace and stability,” Wilder says. Without a credible election in 2014, he says, it’s very unclear who would control the security forces, and Afghanistan could be at risk of a return to civil war.
  • USIP’s role: “Moving forward, we at the U.S. Institute of Peace are trying to continue to emphasize the importance of the political transition,” Wilder says. Planned USIP activities in Afghanistan include building awareness of the election through the media, training women to strengthen their ability to participate in the election, continuing to work on promoting the rule of law, and making grants to civil society organizations. “However,” Wilder says, “The thing we’re hoping to see more of in 2013 and 2014 is progress on the reconciliation front, because ultimately Afghanistan does need an inclusive political settlement if there’s going to be durable peace… There is not a military end to the conflict.”

Explore Further


Related Publications

What’s Next for the U.N.’s Doha Process on Afghanistan?

What’s Next for the U.N.’s Doha Process on Afghanistan?

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

At the end of June, envoys and representatives from more than 25 countries and international organizations gathered in Doha, Qatar, along with representatives from the Taliban under an U.N.-facilitated framework. This meeting was the third of its kind, widely referred to as “Doha 3,” and part of a process to establish a more coordinated and coherent global approach to Afghanistan’s challenges and the Taliban’s rule.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Potential areas of cooperation between the Taliban and the international community, such as private sector development and alternative livelihoods to now-banned opium poppy cultivation, will be on the agenda at a meeting of international envoys for Afghanistan hosted by the United Nations in Doha from June 30 to July 1. Discussions on women’s rights are not included, as the Taliban consider it an internal matter. This is ironic, given that the private sector is one area where the Taliban allow limited women’s participation.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGender

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Afghanistan, historically the leading source of the world’s illegal opium, is on-track for an unprecedented second year of dramatically reduced poppy cultivation, reflecting the Taliban regime’s continuing prohibition against growing the raw material for opiates. The crackdown has won plaudits in international circles, but its full implications call for clear-eyed analysis and well considered responses by the U.S. and others. The ban has deepened the poverty of millions of rural Afghans who depended on the crop for their livelihoods, yet done nothing to diminish opiate exports, as wealthier landowners sell off inventories. The unfortunate reality is that any aid mobilized to offset harm from the ban will be grossly insufficient and ultimately wasted unless it fosters broad-based rural and agricultural development that benefits the most affected poorer households. 

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications