A new Peace Brief details the lessons learned and best practices on engaging men in support of women’s rights and empowerment in South Asia and the Middle East. It is based on a November 2012 forum organized by USIP’s Center for Gender and Peacebuilding.

Engaging Men in Women’s Rights and Empowerment in South Asia and the Middle East

Summary

  • The role of Islam in society must be taken into account and better understood by international institutions and civil society as women’s programming is designed and implemented in the Middle East, South Asia, and North Africa.
  • Engaging male leaders including Imams on issues of women’s rights is often overlooked but critical to a long-term strategy.
  • Broadening the educational discourse around Islam and creating spaces for female religious scholars in male-dominated educational institutions is a high priority for many Afghan women.
  • Expanding women’s political involvement must not be solely based on a quota system.
  • Engaging young people as key resources for the advancement of women’s rights is essential.
  • Employing media resources as a tool of education on the importance of women’s rights is one of the areas for further exploration.
  • Promoting masculine ideals that include non-violent approaches to problem solving is a critical consideration in advancing women’s rights.

About This Brief

Anne Angarola is a research assistant with USIP’s Center for Gender and Peacebuilding and has been involved in women’s programming in rural Tanzania with a small development nongovernmental organization since 2005, Steve Steiner is a gender adviser with the USIP Center for Gender and Peacebuilding and served as a senior adviser in the Department of State Office of Global Women’s Issues, and Shannon Zimmerman is a program specialist with USIP’s Center for Gender and Peacebuilding and focuses on the nexus of security and women’s empowerment. This brief is based on a forum held by the Center for Gender and Peacebuilding at USIP on engaging men in support of women’s programming. In expert dialogues facilitated by Kathleen Kuehnast, director of the center, and Ambassador Steven E. Steiner as part of a larger project funded by USAID, women from Afghanistan and Iraq identified the necessity of engaging men in support of women’s programming in order for that programming to be successful. Four experts spoke at USIP on November 19, 2012 about their experience in engaging men to support women’s rights. This brief details the experiences the panelists presented.


Related Publications

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

How to Support Female Entrepreneurs in Afghanistan

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Potential areas of cooperation between the Taliban and the international community, such as private sector development and alternative livelihoods to now-banned opium poppy cultivation, will be on the agenda at a meeting of international envoys for Afghanistan hosted by the United Nations in Doha from June 30 to July 1. Discussions on women’s rights are not included, as the Taliban consider it an internal matter. This is ironic, given that the private sector is one area where the Taliban allow limited women’s participation.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsGender

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

As Taliban Poppy Ban Continues, Afghan Poverty Deepens

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Afghanistan, historically the leading source of the world’s illegal opium, is on-track for an unprecedented second year of dramatically reduced poppy cultivation, reflecting the Taliban regime’s continuing prohibition against growing the raw material for opiates. The crackdown has won plaudits in international circles, but its full implications call for clear-eyed analysis and well considered responses by the U.S. and others. The ban has deepened the poverty of millions of rural Afghans who depended on the crop for their livelihoods, yet done nothing to diminish opiate exports, as wealthier landowners sell off inventories. The unfortunate reality is that any aid mobilized to offset harm from the ban will be grossly insufficient and ultimately wasted unless it fosters broad-based rural and agricultural development that benefits the most affected poorer households. 

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications