Analysts have raised the possibility of increased turbulence in the world system as the flow of information becomes democratized, as information becomes broadly available outside previously narrowly defined areas of expertise, and hence, as hierarchies tumble. Others have focused on the impact on military security of the increasingly sophisticated means available to both rival states, as well as groups that challenge states, for changing and disrupting the flows of information and the information systems on which modern militaries are so heavily dependent.

Overview

The little academic work that has been done on the impact of information technology on international relations has focused on one of the following two themes:

Analysts have raised the possibility of increased turbulence in the world system as the flow of information becomes democratized, as information becomes broadly available outside previously narrowly defined areas of expertise, and hence, as hierarchies tumble.

Others have focused on the impact on military security of the increasingly sophisticated means available to both rival states, as well as groups that challenge states, for changing and disrupting the flows of information and the information systems on which modern militaries are so heavily dependent. A subset of this literature has raised the specter, without presenting credible evidence, of the Internet allowing a proliferation of both terrorist organizations, as well as of technologies such as bombs and other weapons that such organizations might use.

A third possibility has received little academic attention: The growing use of information technology, particularly the Internet, by non-state actors might actually create new communities and forms of interaction that are conducive to international peace and security. This could happen in two ways.

First, the Internet offers the potential for closed networking among elite groups of professionals, analysts, and policy makers for sharing information and testing ideas that may yet be too controversial to be launched publicly. Such networking speeds up interaction among members of critical policy communities, and reduces the need for frequent physical gatherings.

In a recently completed survey for the Program in Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security (ACDIS) of the University of Illinois, the Ford Foundation, and the International Peace Academy (IPA) of the possibilities of using the Internet in furthering the cause of arms control and security in South Asia, I presented a model of such networking to a number senior analysts, researchers, and former policy makers. The responses, while largely favorable, differed in terms of the kinds of security issues that would be best addressed by such networking, and the problems that would have to be dealt with before such networking became possible.

Second, the increased use of the Internet by civic organizations around the world to network, share resources and ideas, and develop common strategies not just within countries, but also across the boundaries of countries, in a number of issue human rights, environment, nuclear non-proliferation, arms control, and so strengthens democratic functioning and helps create more responsive governments. Citizen diplomacy, therefore, does not just build confidence across state boundaries, but also reduces insecurity among the civilian populations within state boundaries, and hence enhances local capacity for managing incipient conflicts.

In a doctoral thesis completed in 1995, I had examined some of these possibilities through a comparison of transnational networking focused on the following four issues: (a) the environmental damage to the Amazon basin in Brazil (b) the Chiapas insurgency in Mexico (c) the potential environmental damage from large dam projects on the Narmada river in India, and (d) the insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir in India. For each of these issues, I examined the role that information technology had played in allowing networks of individuals and organizations to promote common agendas, develop joint campaigns, and ultimately influence policy processes.

In this brief paper, I will examine the possibilities that the Internet in particular, and information technology in general, provide for enhanced peace and security in South Asia. This exercise should offer useful comparative lessons (despite the uniqueness of each individual region) to other organizations attempting to promote electronic networking in the area of international peace and security in the world's various regions. Examples include the Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainable Development, which sponsors the Northeast Asia Peace and Security Network, and the International Peace Academy's Program in Conflict Management in Africa, which is attempting to increase networking among civil society organizations in Africa in the interests of enhancing the contribution of such organizations to conflict management.

This examination will draw upon my recent survey tour of South Asia, and from the relevant sections of my doctoral thesis, and will address both the issue of the Internet as a networking tool for elite groups, as well as the role of information technology in promoting transnational civil society networking.

About the Author

Chetan Kumar
Associate
International Peace Academy
777 UN Plaza, 4th Flr.
New York, NY, 10017
e-mail: kumar@ipapost.ipacademy.org
Phone: 212-687-4586
Fax: 212-983-8246

This paper was prepared for the Virtual Diplomacy conference hosted by United States Institute of Peace in Washington, D.C. on April 1 and 2, 1997.


Related Publications

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications