Secretary of State John Kerry contested what he called “revisionist commentary” about the Obama administration’s foreign policy, laying out a defense of achievements such as a global climate change agreement and the Iran nuclear accord, as part of the U.S. Institute of Peace’s “Passing the Baton” conference on Jan. 10. Kerry also shared his concerns about what he called the “fact-less political environment” and the President-elect’s penchant for communicating foreign policy positions on Twitter. 

Woodruff and Kerry

“What troubles me a little bit is that people are not separating a remarkable transformation that has taken place globally, naturally, from things that we’re really responsible for,” Kerry said in a discussion with Judy Woodruff, anchor and managing editor of PBS NewsHour. “Arab Spring -- we didn’t start the Arab Spring. We couldn’t have stopped the Arab Spring. We couldn’t have put a lid on it.”

The revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa, most of which deteriorated into violent conflict, happened spontaneously, he said, “because of where those countries found themselves relative to modernity, to the global economies, to their own governance challenges and to the centuries old passions and definitions and differences that have defined those countries for a long time.”

“But as I listen to some of the revisionist commentary, and they’re saying, 'Well the Obama administration didn’t do this or didn’t do that or whatever.' There’s no way the Obama administration doing anything would have changed what was happening in those countries.”

For the U.S., Kerry said that the rise of the “fact-less political environment” has had dire consequences for the nation’s capability to effectively confront major foreign policy and national security issues, including China, Russia and the fragility of states where governance is weakened by incompetence or illegitimacy and makes movements such as violent extremist groups seem like desirable alternatives to some citizens.

“How is democracy going to move faster and more efficiently, given the increasingly hard task of building consensus without the consumption of facts?” he said.

Kerry pledged to work to “restore a measure of accountability to our system” once he’s out of office.

Although not naming Trump directly, Kerry said, “If policy is going to be made in 140 characters on Twitter, and every reasonable measurement of accountability is being bypassed, we have a problem,” Kerry said. His comments were echoed at other points of the conference by speakers such as former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.

Kerry bemoaned the lack of critical debate about climate change during the election cycle, as well as other crucial topics that were overlooked amid more salacious subjects.

When asked about the transition at the State Department from President Obama’s administration to President-elect Trump’s, Kerry said it was going “pretty smoothly,” primarily because “there hasn’t been a lot of it.”

He said he hasn’t yet met his replacement, former ExxonMobil chief Rex Tillerson, who testified today in a nomination hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “I’m still expecting to meet with my successor at some point in the near term,” Kerry said.


Related Publications

China’s Dilemmas Deepen as North Korea Enters Ukraine War

China’s Dilemmas Deepen as North Korea Enters Ukraine War

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Until late October, the big questions about China’s role in the Ukraine conflict centered around whether Beijing would choose to expand its support for Russia to include lethal aid, or if it might engage in more active peacemaking to end the conflict. Then, on November 4, the Pentagon confirmed that North Korea sent more than 10,000 troops to Russia’s Kursk oblast, where Ukraine had captured some territory earlier this year. Days later, the State Department confirmed that North Korean soldiers had begun fighting Ukrainian troops.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

How Should Seoul Respond to North Korea's Soldiers in Russia?

How Should Seoul Respond to North Korea's Soldiers in Russia?

Wednesday, November 13, 2024

The Ukraine war is taking a new turn with the involvement of North Korean soldiers. Washington estimates that, so far, North Korea has sent approximately 10,000 troops to Russia — around 8,000 of whom have been deployed to the western region of Kursk, where Ukraine seized territory in a surprise attack earlier this year. And as U.S. officials predicted in late October, North Korean troops have reportedly begun engaging in direct combat.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Australia’s Strategic Thinking on the War in Ukraine, NATO, and Indo-Pacific Security

Australia’s Strategic Thinking on the War in Ukraine, NATO, and Indo-Pacific Security

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

Russia’s war against Ukraine has spurred closer cooperation between Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific states and organizations, particularly Australia and NATO, signaling a deepening of ties that could have long-term benefits for global security. Over the long term, writes security expert Gorana Grgić, such alignment is crucial for signaling to potential aggressors that global coalitions are prepared to respond. This report analyzes Australia’s response in order to examine Canberra’s strategic thinking with respect to cross-theater cooperation, and it offers recommendations for US, NATO, and Australian policymakers.

Type: Special Report

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

Many Ways to Fail: The Costs to China of an Unsuccessful Taiwan Invasion

Many Ways to Fail: The Costs to China of an Unsuccessful Taiwan Invasion

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

A Chinese invasion of Taiwan would be an extremely difficult military, complex operation. China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has been thinking seriously since the early 2000s about what such a landing would require. For over two decades, its force development efforts have been focused on the weapons, equipment, doctrine and operational concepts required to conquer the island in the face of full U.S. military intervention. The PLA has made considerable progress toward that goal and may deem itself fully capable by the 2027 force development target set by Xi Jinping.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications