When Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas were officially merged into Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province in May 2018, the five million residents of the former tribal areas acquired the same constitutional rights and protections—including access to a formal judicial system—as Pakistan’s other citizens. This report, based on field research carried out by the authors, explores the status of the formal justice system’s expansion, finding both positive trends and severe administrative and capacity challenges, and offers recommendations to address these issues.

Supporters of the FATA youth jirga celebrate the merger of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas in May 2018. (Bilawal Arbab/ EPA-EFE/ Shutterstock)
Supporters of the FATA youth jirga celebrate the merger of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas in May 2018. (Bilawal Arbab/ EPA-EFE/ Shutterstock)

Summary

  • The inability to access formal justice has long been a driver of conflict in Pakistan’s tribal communities. The merger of the former Federally Administered Tribal Areas into Pakistan’s formal judicial system in 2018–19 has the potential to promote both justice and peace.
  • Recent research suggests that the reform process in what are now known as the Newly Merged Districts (NMDs) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province has created challenges in terms of the capacity of various justice sector institutions.
  • Even though informal jirgas have been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, they remain an integral (but informal) part of the justice system, providing speedy justice that resonates with local values.
  • However, case files from courts established in the NMDs indicate that most litigants now enjoy much greater protection of their rights and civil liberties.
  • Women’s access to justice has increased dramatically, but sizable investment is needed to make legal institutions more gender sensitive. 
  • The population of the NMDs needs greater information about, awareness of, and access to the formal justice system, and access to legal aid and counsel needs to be improved.

About the Report

This report assesses the provision of constitutional guarantees and protections related to the formal criminal justice system in Pakistan’s former Federally Administered Tribal Areas. Commissioned by the South Asia program at the United States Institute of Peace, the report is based on an analysis of case files from the districts of Khyber and Mohmand, supplemented by surveys of and interviews and focus groups with litigants, lawyers, and government stakeholders.

About the Authors

Barrister Umar Mahmood Khan is director for law and policy at the Lahore-based research organization Musawi. He has worked with the Justice Sector Support Program in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa since 2017. Rana Hamza Ijaz, a public policy and governance expert, is director of research at Musawi. Sevim Saadat is director of programs at Musawi and also serves as clinical professor for the Human Rights Clinic at the Centre for Human Rights at University College Lahore.
 


Related Publications

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Toward a Durable India-Pakistan Peace: A Roadmap through Trade

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Despite a three-year long cease-fire along their contested border, trade and civil society engagement between India and Pakistan has dwindled, exacerbating the fragility of their relationship. With recently re-elected governments now in place in both countries, there is a window of opportunity to rekindle trade to bolster their fragile peace, support economic stability in Pakistan, create large markets and high-quality jobs on both sides, and open doors for diplomatic engagement that could eventually lead to progress on more contentious issues.

Type: Analysis

Economics

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

How Have India’s Neighbors Reacted to Its Election?

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Narendra Modi was sworn in on June 9 for his third consecutive term as India’s prime minister. Public polls had predicted a sweeping majority for Modi, so it came as some surprise that his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost ground with voters and had to rely on coalition partners to form a ruling government. Although India’s elections were fought mainly on domestic policy issues, there were important exceptions and Modi’s electoral setback could have implications for India’s regional and global policies.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

What Does Further Expansion Mean for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization?

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Last week, foreign ministers from member-states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) gathered in Astana, Kazakhstan. The nine-member SCO — made up of China, India, Russia, Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — represents one of the largest regional organizations in the world. And with the SCO’s annual heads-of-state summit slated for early July, the ministers’ meeting offers an important glimpse into the group’s priorities going forward. USIP’s Bates Gill and Carla Freeman examine how regional security made its way to the top of the agenda, China’s evolving role in Central Asia and why SCO expansion has led to frustrations among member states.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications